Olympic Logo 2012

For Better or Worse, Explained

Sources report that $800,000 USD was spent developing the London logo for the 2012 Olympic games.

The question is: do you think you can do better?

Since this is less of a rhetorical question and more of a give-in, I invite you to post your "better" designs on this site.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, however : is it actually possible to create a design that is worse?

I challenge you to post a design that is less aesthetically pleasing and more terrible than the $800K logo, displayed at the top of this blog.

Let the games begin!

Friday, June 8, 2007

Groovy

SOOOOO much better... see the emphasis with multiple o's?

ICK

Looks like a scab...

Interesting...

I like it. A lot.

Finally! Some creativity

Not saying that this is GENIUS or anything, but I think we can at least say, clean, smart, and not insulting.

Plain... but better

Predictable, maybe.... induces epilepsy? definitely not.... this is EASILY better than the Saved by the Bell, 80's charged flickering logo displayed top right of this site.

Just plain weird...

This makes me think of Teletubbies, not that I'm some resident expert on Teletubbies. But come on! Where is the relevancy? This could be a logo for a lightbulb or perfume bottling company.... eeks

Not quite worse, but bad

I'm not sure how I feel about the blue squiggly line... I get that it's supposed to be a river... but it looks like intestine to me... bleh

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)